Aspect Ratio Test

Bad aspect, clearly not 4:3


Let’s use 4:3

I am naturally exaggerating here. My point is that a categorical statement that 4:3 is better than 16:9 is nonsense. You should not blindly pick 16:9 just because it is there, in many cases the 16:9 format is simply the 4:3 image cropped. Case in point:

This is the exact same image, I just threw away the sky. In many cases, this is what happens when a 4:3 sensor provides a 16:9 frame.  Perhaps you don’t want to save all those pixels of the sky, and you are not going to get a higher horizontal resolution anyway, so why not chose 16:9. I personally think it looks pretty good.



Author: prescienta

Prescientas ruler

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s